Ghost postings: spotting a job ad that leads nowhere
Between a fifth and a third of online postings match no real opening. Here is what they look like.
Guides
Ten short, sourced pieces on what actually decides an application. Every claim carries its source in the text.
Between a fifth and a third of online postings match no real opening. Here is what they look like.
Nine interviews out of ten go to people who applied on day one. This is not about merit, it is about the queue.
Recruiters read less and less, parsers filter first. Here is what breaks machine reading, and how to check it yourself.
The problem is not using a machine to write. The problem is producing generic text, and it shows.
A photo on a US resume gets the file dropped. A German resume without one looks incomplete. This is not a detail.
A bullet without a number reads as an opinion. With one, it becomes checkable. Here is how to find numbers when you think you have none.
They optimise for volume. The market has started penalising exactly that.
Past a certain point, each extra application lowers the quality of the previous ones. Here is where to draw the line.
77% of candidates think less of a company that does not reply. That does not help you. Here is what does.
Most postings publish no range. That is no reason to walk in blind.
The problem with a career change is not missing skills. It is that nobody knows where to file them.
Every ad mixes three things: what will eliminate you, what will rank you, and what fills the page. Telling them apart changes what you write.
The same photo is expected in Berlin, tolerated in Paris and disqualifying in New York. The job's country decides, not your taste.
A first resume does not lack experience, it lacks translation. What you have already done counts, provided you tell it in results.
The German market does not read a resume, it reads a file. Format, photo, date and attachments follow precise customs.
The advertised salary is one line of the calculation. Commute, remote days, bonus and growth convert too, and often change the ranking.
Question-and-answer lists prepare everyone the same way. The ad, your application and the employer's history prepare you.
A career gap does not disqualify you, a disguised one does. One honest, dated, closed line beats every layout acrobatic.
A foreign recruiter's first question is not your skill, it is your right to work in their country. Answering it upfront changes the file's fate.
The project rarely fails on skills. It fails on the order of steps: picking a country before understanding who can actually hire a foreign candidate there.
The same word covers five realities, from a worldwide role to an office in disguise. Confusing them costs weeks of wasted applications.
Probation is decided less by performance than by three observable things: understanding fast, delivering small, and making work visible without selling yourself.
The Swiss market pays well, reads fast, and follows precise rules. A file that ignores them is set aside before being judged on substance.
A word-for-word translated resume gives itself away in three lines. It is not the grammar that betrays it, it is the conventions: degrees, verbs, and false friends.
Sent at random, it ends in the bin. Sent at the right moment, to the right person, with a precise reason, it skips the queue entirely.
“Soft skills” convinces nobody. A skill transfers when it is told as a fact: what you did, under what conditions, with what result.
The same ad does not play the same way depending on who posted it. The agency sells a candidate to a client; the employer is looking for a colleague. Everything follows.
The first twenty seconds of a video interview judge your image and sound before your answers. Everything is fixed the day before, nothing is fixed live.
Applying in series is slow; applying in parallel is risky only when improvised. The difference comes down to rigorous tracking and three prepared sentences.